[OSM-legal-talk] Political Change

[Jeffrey Martin]

I just read through http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/FCAFC/2008/71.html

In 128 the appellate court is saying that they did not copy facts, but
instead they copied
the guide created by Nine, because the aggregatators had pretty much copied the
guide created by nine.

In 123 Ice is saying that because the aggregators had recompiled the
information that
what Ice took was individual facts free of copyright.

Is this the issue you want addressed in your new law?

-- 
http://bowlad.com