[OSM-legal-talk] Process for agreeing the new licence

[Sebastian Spaeth]

Peter Miller wrote:
> Richard: Can I assume that you are in agreement with the 'brief brief' or do
> you want to suggest any changes? We really don't want people to stay silent
> now and then raise issues if we produce a licence that delivers on exactly
> that description.

I like the way CC (used to?) present their license. they basically had 
three tabs that said "machine readable form" "legal mumbalese" and 
"human understandable" with the last being what the brief brief is.

At least this is how I remember their website from a view years ago.

spaetz