[OSM-legal-talk] New license: What is publication/distribution?

[Richard Fairhurst]

Frederik Ramm wrote:

> By speaking of "public" on one hand and "wholly internally" on the
> other, the license seems to omit those cases where (a) the use is  
> still
> internal but involves work from someone else, like the print shop  
> or the
> auditing example, and those where (b) the use is not really  
> "public" but
> still takes the form of distributing a product to one or more  
> people or
> organisations.

Yes, it's a good point. Suggest you formally submit the request to  
OSMF, maybe quoting Rob's GPL example.

cheers
Richard