[OSM-legal-talk] ODbL for the DB; what about the contents?

[Simon Ward]

In the preamble for the (old) ODbL draft, it advised that it should be
used with another licence for contents, the ODbL being designed to
protect database rights.

I believe many contributions would deserve some protection in their own
right, they’re not simply “facts”.  How will this be handled?

(I also commented on this at:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Talk:Open_Data_License#ODL_and_other_licences_for_OSM_data)

Simon
-- 
A complex system that works is invariably found to have evolved from a
simple system that works.—John Gall
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/legal-talk/attachments/20081009/13345ad4/attachment.pgp>