[OSM-legal-talk] Paid services from OSM

[Tim Waters (chippy)]

On 10/12/08, Richard Fairhurst <richard at systemed.net> wrote:
> Goodness me, that's an enormously confrontational-sounding posting,

Whoops, it was meant to be more controversial than confrontational.

>  * I would like OSMF to publish the current licence
>  * IMHO OSMF should publish the licence
e.t.c

Publish the licence +1

If things have been sorted and addressed, then please tell us!

 If things haven't been sorted and addressed, then tell us and we can
continue debating use cases about avant-garde performance artists.
(I've a couple ready in draft)