[OSM-legal-talk] License License License

[Andy Robinson (blackadder-lists)]

Simon Ward wrote:
>Sent: 14 October 2008 12:32 AM
>To: legal-talk at openstreetmap.org
>Subject: Re: [OSM-legal-talk] License License License
>
>On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 02:44:07PM +0100, Richard Fairhurst wrote:
>> Tim Waters (chippy) wrote:
>>
>>> Going back to the newly uploaded draft [1]. Maybe it's me, maybe it's
>>> the legal speak, but where does it explicitly say that if someone
>>> creates and releases to an unsuspecting public a derived work (paper
>>> map piddled on by performance artist, say) then they have to also make
>>> available any derived database that they used to make it with?
>>
>> /me starts to laugh hysterically.
>>
>> The version on the OSMF site is not the latest one (i.e. the one
>> containing the work which OSMF paid Jordan for).
>
>I asked for the _current_ draft and got told it would be on the site
>shortly.  Mike responded saying he had put it on the site.  I was
>curious about the timestamp in the metadata, I got told this was the
>draft sent for review.  That all sounds true, but I’m still miffed we
>didn’t just get to see the current draft in the first place (assuming
>the one posted is current and doesn’t contain random clauses about
>Richard F owning all your first born, etc; I haven’t read it yet).
>

Apologies to all, that’s my mistake. I forwarded the wrong version to Mike
for inclusion on the website. I'll have that sorted asap. The version
Richard just posted is the correct one.

Cheers

Andy