[OSM-legal-talk] Database rights and who has them
Frederik Ramm
frederik at remote.org
Wed Apr 1 14:53:31 BST 2009
Hi,
Brian Quinion wrote:
> My impression is that it might have implications for whether database
> rights apply to OSM data and who owns that protection since it
> suggests:
[...]
Interesting points. I guess ODbL tries to somehow override the cases
where database rights do not arise by saying "well then we have a contract".
> 'Remember that a database can attract copyright as well as database
> rights. The reduction in the scope of protection under database rights
> may mean that the makers of databases seek to rely more on copyright
> in order to protect their investment.'
Copyright, in connection with databases, never means copyright on the
contents, just a copyright on the layout, structure, or modes of access
to the database. I don't think there is a lot of copyrightable material
like that in OSM, and if it were, then the copyright owners would
neither be OSMF nor the mappers, but the individuals who have designed
the database.
Bye
Frederik
More information about the legal-talk
mailing list