[OSM-legal-talk] Concerns about ODbL

[OJ W]

On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 1:12 PM, Richard Fairhurst <richard at systemed.net> wrote:
>
> jean-christophe.haessig wrote:
>> Moreover, after having read the proposed license text and some comments
>> on wiki pages, I am under the impression that most of the participants in
>> the discussion are public domain advocates and that they may use this
>> license change to promote their views.
>
> Just to dispel any conspiracy theories: that certainly isn't true.


However, the ability to create an uncopiable map image from OSM data
(one of the main aims of some PD advocates) does seem to have appeared
in the ODbL license?