[OSM-legal-talk] Are Produced Works anti-share alike?

[Andy Allan]

I don't think we want to provide a bypass for the reverse engineering  
clause, so much as ensure that it can be an SA produced work plus no  
reverse engineering combined.

Cheers,
Andy

Who should be out on his bike mapping Dolgellau instead of reading  
legal-talk on holiday...



On 6 Mar 2009, at 16:55, Richard Fairhurst <richard at systemed.net> wrote:

>
> Richard Fairhurst wrote:
>> there are three things that spring to mind
>
> I meant four (no-one expects the Spanish Inquisition, etc.).
>
> 4. OSMF can request additional permissions over and above ODbL from  
> its
> users, as part of the new user sign-up, or the licence change  
> agreement.
> (Effectively dual-licensing.) The ability to relicence as CC-BY-SA  
> could be
> specified as an additional permission if we so decided.
>
> cheers
> Richard
> -- 
> View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Are-Produced-Works-anti-share-alike--tp22375518p22376308.html
> Sent from the OpenStreetMap - Legal Talk mailing list archive at  
> Nabble.com.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> legal-talk mailing list
> legal-talk at openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk