[OSM-legal-talk] ODbL: Click-Through required?

Ulf Möller usenet at ulfm.de
Sat Mar 7 10:41:50 GMT 2009


Frederik Ramm schrieb:

> "... I think that the assumption is that the contract is implicit - you 
> do stuff with the data, you accept the contract.", adding that "the cure 
> for breach of a contractual situation is typically how much money did 
> the Licensor lose (open Licensor = none)".

There's no way that using data that you have a right to use anyway could 
be interpreted as a manifestation of assent to some contract. (Of course 
the assumption here is that the data cannot be protected by copyright etc.)





More information about the legal-talk mailing list