[OSM-legal-talk] ODbL: Click-Through required?
Ulf Möller
usenet at ulfm.de
Sat Mar 7 10:41:50 GMT 2009
Frederik Ramm schrieb:
> "... I think that the assumption is that the contract is implicit - you
> do stuff with the data, you accept the contract.", adding that "the cure
> for breach of a contractual situation is typically how much money did
> the Licensor lose (open Licensor = none)".
There's no way that using data that you have a right to use anyway could
be interpreted as a manifestation of assent to some contract. (Of course
the assumption here is that the data cannot be protected by copyright etc.)
More information about the legal-talk
mailing list