[OSM-legal-talk] decision removing data

Dirk-Lüder Kreie osm-list at deelkar.net
Tue Aug 10 01:22:18 BST 2010


Am 08.08.2010 10:38, schrieb John Smith:
> On 8 August 2010 18:30, Frederik Ramm <frederik at remote.org> wrote:
>> I'll completely replace it with the PD PGS shoreline if anyone ever again
>> says "we cannot do X because of the imported Australian shoreline".
> 
> I'm starting to think 80n was right, if you were really serious about
> wanting a PD fork you would fork it rather than trying to force
> everyone else to do what you want, when it's clear just as many want
> SA...

There is a slight difference of an ideal situation and a situation "good
enough".

CC-BY-SA is obviously not "good enough". ODbL might be, in conjunction
with the CT it should be.

The Ideal would be PD/CC0, because that wouldn't limit us in so many ways.

-- 
Dirk-Lüder "Deelkar" Kreie
Bremen - 53.0901°N 8.7868°E

Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 262 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/legal-talk/attachments/20100810/8f8d0f9f/attachment.pgp>


More information about the legal-talk mailing list