[OSM-legal-talk] decision removing data
Dirk-Lüder Kreie
osm-list at deelkar.net
Tue Aug 10 01:22:18 BST 2010
Am 08.08.2010 10:38, schrieb John Smith:
> On 8 August 2010 18:30, Frederik Ramm <frederik at remote.org> wrote:
>> I'll completely replace it with the PD PGS shoreline if anyone ever again
>> says "we cannot do X because of the imported Australian shoreline".
>
> I'm starting to think 80n was right, if you were really serious about
> wanting a PD fork you would fork it rather than trying to force
> everyone else to do what you want, when it's clear just as many want
> SA...
There is a slight difference of an ideal situation and a situation "good
enough".
CC-BY-SA is obviously not "good enough". ODbL might be, in conjunction
with the CT it should be.
The Ideal would be PD/CC0, because that wouldn't limit us in so many ways.
--
Dirk-Lüder "Deelkar" Kreie
Bremen - 53.0901°N 8.7868°E
Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 262 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/legal-talk/attachments/20100810/8f8d0f9f/attachment.pgp>
More information about the legal-talk
mailing list