[OSM-legal-talk] Simple question about CT
David Groom
reviews at pacific-rim.net
Mon Aug 16 16:40:25 BST 2010
----- Original Message -----
From: "Nakor" <nakor.osm at gmail.com>
To: <legal-talk at openstreetmap.org>
Sent: Monday, August 16, 2010 3:51 PM
Subject: Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Simple question about CT
>
> On 8/16/2010 6:24 AM, David Groom wrote:
>>
>> Therefore surely if "I" agree to the CT terms then legally it covers all
>> the edits I make. If the intention is for it only to cover the edits "I"
>> make when logged in o a "specific user account", then I would have
>> thought the CT terms need rewriting something along the lines of
>>
>>
>
> So people that have "import" accounts for which the data cannot be
> re-licensed will not be able to either re-license their other
> contributions nor contribute at all to OSM after/if the license switch
> happens?
>
> Thanks,
>
> N.
>
On the basis of the current wording of the CT's what you have written above
would be correct.
Since the wording of the CT's covers a person and not a user account, then
anyone who has added any data in the past which is not compatible with the
CTs cant agree the CT and thus will be prevented from adding anything to
OSM, whether it is through the user account they have used in the past or
any newly created user account.
So not only is it likely that large amounts of data will disappear from OSM,
but the people that added that data will be prevented from trying to fix the
black holes.
Plus of course, as they people are prevented from doing any editing, they
will therefore cease to be "active contributors", and therefore won't be
able to take part in any future licensing vote!
David
More information about the legal-talk
mailing list