[OSM-legal-talk] [OSM-talk] NearMap Community Licence and OSM Contributor Terms

[SteveC]

On Aug 19, 2010, at 2:44 PM, Peteris Krisjanis wrote:
>> NearMap have some valid things they pointed out might make the CT's better. The LWG has had approximately 12 hours (from memory) to look at them, and for all we know might think they're awesome and change. Maybe not. We don't know.
> 
> I'm getting kinda tired of these promises. Complains about section 3
> were already expressed two weeks ago. I haven't got clear answer. But
> I still have a hope for LWG and OSMF, so I really hope answer comes
> soon. I really don't want to sound like I don't respect your work.

The LWG are volunteers who are overloaded and work for free, therefore they're not as snappy as you'd like.

Steve

stevecoast.com