[OSM-legal-talk] Size of NearMap Contribution
Frederik Ramm
frederik at remote.org
Fri Aug 20 10:03:00 BST 2010
Hi,
John Smith wrote:
>> (Not, of course, this particular version of the CT, if that's what you're
>
> Exactly... you are trying to sell us a particular happy meal that
> isn't making us happy...
"us" being...?
And I'm not trying to sell anything. If you agree that some for of CT is
required, and you have a better idea, then why don't you try to "sell it
to us".
My main problem is that we're having this discussion now, when the CT
were finalised in December last year, and we started to have new users
agree to the CT in spring this year. What new facts have arisen since then?
Bye
Frederik
More information about the legal-talk
mailing list