[OSM-legal-talk] Size of NearMap Contribution

[Simon Ward]

On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 09:59:41PM +1000, Liz wrote:
> I find the choice of 300 people quite ironic.
> That's about the membership of OSMF, from where comes the pressure to change 
> the licence and the CTs.

Let’s not forget that some of those members don’t agree with the licence
and/or CTs.

The membership was supposed to be voting to go forward with the process,
which included putting it to the community for adoption, not for forcing
the change on the community based on OSMF’s idea of critical mass.

Simon
-- 
A complex system that works is invariably found to have evolved from a
simple system that works.—John Gall
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/legal-talk/attachments/20100820/8ec4abe2/attachment.pgp>