[OSM-legal-talk] [Osmf-talk] The license/fork discussion: A solution proposal

[davespod]

Apologies to legal-talk, it would have helped if I had quoted the original
proposal that started the thread

On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 3:17 AM, ce-test wrote:

> A fork as stipulated should not be necessarily about a group of people
> leaving OSM , but about we (OSM) deciding to continue in two or more
> future
> directions, covered by different licenses, and maybe finally decide which
> license
> fits best. 

> This would require the OSM database to include a extra field for each
> and every item indicating the license the data was provided by its
> contributor.
> The license choice can be made in the users profile.

Cheers

David
-- 
View this message in context: http://gis.638310.n2.nabble.com/Re-OSM-legal-talk-Osmf-talk-The-license-fork-discussion-A-solution-proposal-tp5457206p5457256.html
Sent from the Legal Talk mailing list archive at Nabble.com.