[OSM-legal-talk] To calm some waters - about Section 3
Frederik Ramm
frederik at remote.org
Thu Aug 26 08:50:10 BST 2010
Hi,
Kevin Peat wrote:
> Well I think someone wanting a PD project would need to start from
> scratch anyway as it would be hard for them to demonstrate that any
> existing data wasn't encumbered with other licenses given the wide use
> of imports and tracing in lots of countries.
I think so too, but I think this is a problem that we don't need to
solve now. Should the project want to change their license in 10 years,
then they will have to think about that then.
It is quite possible that a data source which we have used for tracing
and which makes certain demands at the moment, stops making these
demands in the future (eg there might be a source that currently says
"CCBYSA or ODbL use only" but in 5 years the company has another product
which is twice as good, and thus decides to lift any license
restrictions on the old, which would of course also lift the restriction
on the data in OSM).
There's no reason to limit the options of a future OSM by perpetuating
some currently existing outside restrictions which may cease to exist at
any time.
Bye
Frederik
More information about the legal-talk
mailing list