[OSM-legal-talk] To calm some waters - about Section 3

[Simon Ward]

On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 10:04:01AM +0100, Rob Myers wrote:
> So I don't think setting a minimum attribution level is a good idea,
> at least from a "user freedom" point of view.

I agree. I mentioned a minimum attribution because others seem to want
that.  The LWG and/or OSMF only seem to be considering two options other
than the explicitly named licences:  Attribution, or attribution +
share‐alike.  I care much less about attribution than I do about the
freedoms of users of OSM and derivatives.

Simon
-- 
A complex system that works is invariably found to have evolved from a
simple system that works.—John Gall
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/legal-talk/attachments/20100826/444aab70/attachment.pgp>