[OSM-legal-talk] Licence Implementation plan - declines or non-responses

[jamesmikedupont at googlemail.com]

On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 2:03 AM, Eugene Alvin Villar <seav80 at gmail.com> wrote:

> ...why should the onus of forking be
> on the license-change agreers? If this is indeed the case, then the ones who
> should fork are those for CC-BY-SA 2.0.
>
because the license change is not going to work in the first try.
Technically you need a beta test phase.
never change a running system. Get it running first, dont break what
we have already.

mike