[OSM-legal-talk] [OSM-talk] ODbL vs CC-by-SA pros and cons

[M∡rtin Koppenhoefer]

2010/8/31 Liz <edodd at billiau.net>:
> On Tue, 31 Aug 2010, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
>> actually I feel that you treated this issue a little negligent. The
>> import guidelines stated since 5 March 2008 (quote):
>> "At the time of writing (spring 2008),
>
>
> well spring isn't in March (here)
> spring starts shortly
> so whoever wrote that was a little careless.


due to the fantastic wiki-software I was nevertheless able to derive
the date when this note was amended.

cheers,
Martin

btw.: The imported dataset seems to be this one (I followed a link in the wiki):
Source: 25k Topographic Map
Map: VGI (Vojno Geografski Institut Jugoslavije) Yugoslav Military
Geographic Institute
Years: 1970's and early 80's
Classes: No classification (categorization)
Features: Line Feature Class
Coverage: about ~50% - 60%

30 year old uncategorized roads derived from 25k topographic maps. I
am aware that this is better than nothing, but it is IMHO not at all
an argument against the license change.