[OSM-legal-talk] Licence Implementation plan - declines or non-responses

[Liz]

On Tue, 31 Aug 2010, Anthony wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 10:22 PM, Anthony <osm at inbox.org> wrote:
> > First go through all the nodes:  If a node was positioned in a
> > particular place by an accepter, keep it, otherwise revert it to the
> > last accepter-positioned location.  If no accepter positioned it
> > anywhere in the history, delete the node.
> > 
> > Then go through all the ways:  If a way references two or more nodes,
> > keep it.  Otherwise, delete it.  Ditto with relations
> > s/nodes/elements.
> 
> Hmm...then again, maybe this won't work.  There needs to be a
> provision where an accepter taking and moving an entire way doesn't
> cause the entire way to become accepted.  That would reposition all
> the nodes.  But it doesn't change the shape of the way.
> 
> Hmm...not sure how to fix that without causing a lot of complications...
> 

I was thinking about that, as it would leave an opportunity for bot-control
Could the system look at the history up to May 2010 and then decide?