[OSM-legal-talk] some interesting points from the bing license

[Emilie Laffray]

Hello,

In addition, the LWG is going to have a look at the terms for the same
reason.

Emilie Laffray

On 1 December 2010 16:07, Rob Myers <rob at robmyers.org> wrote:

> On 12/01/2010 02:31 PM, David Groom wrote:
>
>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Anthony" <osm at inbox.org>
>>> Isn't http://opengeodata.org/microsoft-imagery-details the "prior
>>> written consent from Microsoft".
>>>
>>
>> I'm not sure it is, or certainly if it is enough.
>>
>
> Anthony's weaponized literalism aside, that post and the PDF clearly
> mentions inclusion of works generated from the imagery in OSM.
>
>
>  I think it need's to do so in a clear and unambiguous manner.
>>
>
> Agreed. Richard has mentioned (several times...) that the ts&cs will
> hopefully be improved shortly.
>
> - Rob.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> legal-talk mailing list
> legal-talk at openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/legal-talk/attachments/20101201/52a63650/attachment.html>