[OSM-legal-talk] some interesting points from the bing license

[Mike Dupont]

At the time of my writing Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 6:59 AM CET is when I
was working on that, there was no mention of this other license, at
least I did not see it.
Sorry for misleading,
mike

On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 9:29 AM, Andrew Harvey <andrew.harvey4 at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 11:10 PM, Anthony <osm at inbox.org> wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 6:34 AM, David Groom <reviews at pacific-rim.net> wrote:
>>> Whereabouts is the "prior written consent from Microsoft" which would enable
>>> us to trace and thus create derivative works?
>>>
>>> David
>>>
>>> [1]  http://opengeodata.org/microsoft-imagery-details
>>
>> Isn't http://opengeodata.org/microsoft-imagery-details the "prior
>> written consent from Microsoft".
>
> But that is opengeodata.org, not Microsoft, you would need a license
> from Microsoft.
>
> _______________________________________________
> legal-talk mailing list
> legal-talk at openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
>



-- 
James Michael DuPont
Member of Free Libre Open Source Software Kosova and Albania
flossk.org flossal.org