[OSM-legal-talk] some interesting points from the bing license

[Anthony]

On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 10:57 AM, Anthony <osm at inbox.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 3:47 PM, Steve Coast <steve at asklater.com> wrote:
>>> On 12/01/2010 02:31 PM, David Groom wrote:
>>> >> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Anthony" <osm at inbox.org> Isn't
>>> >> http://opengeodata.org/microsoft-imagery-details the "prior written
>>> >> consent from Microsoft".
>>> >
>>> > I'm not sure it is, or certainly if it is enough.
>>>
>>> Anthony's weaponized literalism
>>
>> What a fantastic phrase!
>
> What can I say?  Figuring out what legalese actually means, and using
> that meaning to its maximum advantage, is what I do for a living.

By the way, I should point out that my question about
http://opengeodata.org/microsoft-imagery-details was just that, a
question.  David Groom responded with a number of good points that put
into doubt the answer to that question.