[OSM-legal-talk] some interesting points from the bing license

[Sam Larsen]

----- Original Message ----
> From: Richard Fairhurst <richard at systemed.net>
> To: legal-talk at openstreetmap.org
> Sent: Thu, 2 December, 2010 19:02:55
> Subject: Re: [OSM-legal-talk] some interesting points from the bing license
> 
> 
> Richard Fairhurst wrote:
> > I believe there'll be a Bing Maps blog post  going up soon on the same
> > topic.
> 
>http://www.bing.com/community/site_blogs/b/maps/archive/2010/12/01/bing-maps-aerial-imagery-in-openstreetmap.aspx
>x



"you cannot create permanent, offline copies of the imagery"
Isn't this why we couldn't use SPOT imagery for HOT in Pakistan using Potlatch - 
we were only able to use JOSM (& others) due to local caching of tiles in 
Potlatch.  Is this an issue?  


http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/2010_07_Pakistan_Floods/Imagery_and_data_sources#SPOT_.282008.29
 


> 
> Richard
> -- 
> View this message in context: 
>http://gis.638310.n2.nabble.com/OSM-legal-talk-some-interesting-points-from-the-bing-license-tp5790772p5797213.html
>
> Sent  from the Legal Talk mailing list archive at  Nabble.com.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> legal-talk  mailing list
> legal-talk at openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
>