[OSM-legal-talk] New phrase in section 2
Anthony
osm at inbox.org
Fri Dec 3 17:41:10 GMT 2010
On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 12:33 PM, Anthony <osm at inbox.org> wrote:
> However, I don't know of any jurisdiction where clear, plain language,
> unintended consequences are unenforcible.
And, actually, you can ignore that I've even said that. I don't see
the point in arguing over this. Suffice it to say that I don't claim
or even believe there was any maliciousness involved in adding that
phrase into the CT.
More information about the legal-talk
mailing list