[OSM-legal-talk] New phrase in section 2

Anthony osm at inbox.org
Fri Dec 3 17:41:10 GMT 2010


On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 12:33 PM, Anthony <osm at inbox.org> wrote:
> However, I don't know of any jurisdiction where clear, plain language,
> unintended consequences are unenforcible.

And, actually, you can ignore that I've even said that.  I don't see
the point in arguing over this.  Suffice it to say that I don't claim
or even believe there was any maliciousness involved in adding that
phrase into the CT.



More information about the legal-talk mailing list