[OSM-legal-talk] New phrase in section 2

[andrzej zaborowski]

Hi Mike,

On 7 December 2010 21:44, Mike Collinson <mike at ayeltd.biz> wrote:
> And to confirm ... the new phrase was introduced by mistake when initially
> setting up the 1.1 draft document and carried over into 1.2. I have removed
> it and checked all the other wording, though I'd certainly appreciate
> another check.  The only difference between the proposed 1.2  text:
>
> http://docs.google.com/View?id=dd9g3qjp_933xs7nvfb

The "active contributor" definition contains "who that has edited"
("who" or "that" is not needed).

Can you explain what "You do not need to guarantee that [contributed
data is compatible with our license]" means? Since OSMF is not bound
to remove such conflicting data is there any possibility a user can
submit such data without automatically being in violation of the third
party's rights?

(I have the same doubt about not guaranteeing compatibility with
future OSM licenses)

Cheers