[OSM-legal-talk] New phrase in section 2

[Simon Poole]

Franics writes:
> What do you suggest? The only practical option I can see is for OSMF
> to supply a list of approved third party licenses that are
> "compatible" with OSMF and refuse anything not licensed under one of
> those.

This or a list of approved sources as I have already suggested. 

The current wording in the CTs 1.2 simply throws us back to the pre-CT 1.0
state (depending on the mapper to make a decision on licensing issues). The 
LWG actually knows that this doesn't work, but obviously doesn't want to
actually do anything about it.

See https://docs.google.com/View?id=dd9g3qjp_86hf7fnqg8 "4. Data Imports"


Simon