[OSM-legal-talk] New phrase in section 2

[Simon Poole]

Rob

I'm not assuming anything. 

But I believe it is fair to say that we (as in the larger OSM 
community) don't have an handle on imports in any respect. 

This is mainly due to a rather laisser faire approach in the 
past, and simply that getting correct and formal approval for 
an import is, both for the donor and the importer, a lot of 
work (and more so in the future with a rather complex 
license on the OSM side of things). 

Looking forward, I don't see anyway around a more strict
regime. Clearly that will put more burden on the OSMF and
make imports less attractive, but I can't say that that is a bad 
thing. 

Simon

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Rob Myers" <rob at robmyers.org>
To: <legal-talk at openstreetmap.org>
Sent: Tuesday, December 07, 2010 11:57 PM
Subject: Re: [OSM-legal-talk] New phrase in section 2


> On 07/12/10 22:53, Simon Poole wrote:
>>
>> The LWG actually knows that this doesn't work, but obviously doesn't
>> want to actually do anything about it.
> 
> Please Assume Good Faith.
> 
> Also remember that the LWG meets once a week.
> 
> And that they do read this list.
> 
> - Rob.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> legal-talk mailing list
> legal-talk at openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
>