[OSM-legal-talk] CT clarification: third-party sources

[Ed Avis]

Robert Kaiser <kairo at ...> writes:

>>Well, 67% of 'active contributors' however defined.
> 
>Wait. Stop for a moment here. Doesn't the CT have a very clear 
>definition of how "active contributors" are defined?

It says they have "edited the Project" in the past 3 months.  But the point is
that this could, in principle, be skewed just by denying write access to people
who don't agree.

You are right that it is defined in fairly plain language, and I should not
cast doubt on that point, so please delete the words 'however defined' above.
Sorry.

-- 
Ed Avis <eda at waniasset.com>