[OSM-legal-talk] CT clarification: third-party sources

[Anthony]

On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 5:07 AM, Jukka Rahkonen
<jukka.rahkonen at latuviitta.fi> wrote:
> Frederik Ramm <frederik at ...> writes:
>> On 12/14/10 10:28, Jukka Rahkonen wrote:
>> > I do not really believe that the turnout percentage in any OSM poll
> would reach
>> > 66.7 percent, even if we count just the active contributors.
>>
>> The turnout percentage in the kind of poll mandated by the CT will be 100%:
>>
>> "An 'active contributor' is defined as [someone who] has maintained a
>> valid email address in their registration profile and responds within 3
>> weeks."
>
> Right, I apologize. I was remembering that we have about 15000 active
> contributors but actually we have just that amount of potentially active
> contributors.

Easy mistake to make when an agreement defines a term in a way which
completely contradicts the plain language meaning of the term.