[OSM-legal-talk] CT clarification: third-party sources
Emilie Laffray
emilie.laffray at gmail.com
Tue Dec 14 17:45:18 GMT 2010
On 14 December 2010 16:10, Olaf Schmidt-Wischhöfer <olaf at amen-online.de>wrote:
> Hi,,
>
> > NB: we've been asked to suggest changes to the CT's if we think they
> > are unclear. I cannot remember whether you caught that.
>
> Where should these suggestions be made?
>
> My last suggested change, posted to this list, received no response at all
> from the licensing working group. (The problem is not that other people
> disagreed with my suggestion and gave me feedback will probably lead me to
> suggest an entirely different change. The problem is that I will not spend
> the
> time doing so if the licensing workgroup doesn't care anyway.)
>
>
Sending a message to legal at osmfoundation.org will definitely get some
attention. We are regularly looking at what is in the mailbox. You can see
from the minutes of the LWG that we are taking opinions into consideration.
We are also looking here and while we can't answer personally every message,
we are trying to make sure to address issues that are found when it is
possible.
Emilie Laffray
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/legal-talk/attachments/20101214/f7450432/attachment.html>
More information about the legal-talk
mailing list