[OSM-legal-talk] CT clarification: third-party sources

[Francis Davey]

On 15 December 2010 19:06, Robert Kaiser <kairo at kairo.at> wrote:
> Francis Davey schrieb:
>>
>> There seems (to me) to be nothing wrong
>> in principle in holding a vote by email
>
> You mean other than emails being easily falsified and there's not even the
> slightest guarantee that a normal email is transmitted to the right
> recipient correctly.
>

No, those are practical rather than principled objections and there
are ways of overcoming them (albeit with their own practical
problems). NB: I'm not saying that its a good idea or not, I'm simply
not making comment on practicalities.

-- 
Francis Davey