[OSM-legal-talk] Someone already had a look at the Bing Terms of Use?
David Groom
reviews at pacific-rim.net
Sun Dec 19 14:40:20 GMT 2010
For the record
1) I accept that the Microsoft Licence[1] to use Bing imagery is an early
version, and we have been told it will be revised
2) I suspect that Microsoft do intend that Bing imagery may be used to
update OSM
However:
----- Original Message -----
From: "Rob Myers" <rob at robmyers.org>
To: <legal-talk at openstreetmap.org>
Sent: Sunday, December 19, 2010 11:39 AM
Subject: Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Someone already had a look at the Bing Terms
of Use?
>
> On 19/12/10 10:30, Andrew Harvey wrote:
>>
>> Where is this direct statement from Microsoft that says derived
>> information from aerial imagery delivered through their map api can be
>> licensed under a CT compatible license?
>
> Microsoft have directly stated that Bing imagery may be used to update
> OSM.
>
> The licence PDF states:
>
> "Any updates you make to the OpenStreetMap map via the
> Application (even if not published to third parties) must be contributed
> back to openstreetmaps.org."
>
Which is NOT the same as stating "Microsoft have directly stated that Bing
imagery may be used to update OSM".
Indeed, had Microsoft have directly stated that Bing imagery may be used to
update OSM, then I suspect you would have pointed to a paragraph which
backed up that assertion.
As I've written before[2] the only direct mention Microsoft have made of
derived data made from tracing Bing Imagery is their statement that it isn't
allowed [3].
However, as I stated at the state of this message I suspect that Microsoft
intend that Bing imagery may be used to update OSM, I also suspect that they
intended the wording of the licence [1] to make it clear. On that
(admittedly probably unsound from a legal point of view), basis I have been
tracing from Bing.
David
> Agreeing to the CTs is a condition of doing so.
>
> - Rob.
>
>
[1] http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/images/d/d8/Bing_license.pdf
[2]
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/legal-talk/2010-December/005305.html
[3] http://www.microsoft.com/maps/assets/docs/terms.aspx
More information about the legal-talk
mailing list