[OSM-legal-talk] Someone already had a look at theBing TermsofUse?
Frederik Ramm
frederik at remote.org
Tue Dec 21 13:56:46 GMT 2010
Hi,
On 12/21/10 11:51, Andrew Harvey wrote:
> I am having this conversation because I contribute to OSM on the basis
> that the database will be licensed CC BY-SA and will not be filled
> with data which conflicts with that license. If tracings from Bing
> imagery cannot be distributed under this license, then the OSM
> community should be made aware of this, so we can treat such edits as
> vandalism. If tracings from Bing can be distributed under a CC BY-SA
> license then again the OSM community should be made aware of this so
> we can use this as a mapping source.
I.e. you are not happy with applying your (rather skewed IMHO)
interpretation of legal matters to your own work, but you would prefer
to force it on everyone else in the project, stopping them from using
Bing until the available documentation matches your personal
interpretation, is that right?
Have you applied the same rigor to other data sources that were widely
believed to be usable, e.g. Yahoo?
Bye
Frederik
More information about the legal-talk
mailing list