[OSM-legal-talk] Contributor Terms latest
mike at ayeltd.biz
Tue Feb 23 22:00:34 GMT 2010
At 10:40 PM 23/02/2010, Oliver Kuehn (skobbler) wrote:
>"Apart from that, this is the version we would like to finalise on and which
>has had legal review. Please shout if you see any holes."
>I wonder if there should not be a clarification that any content provided
>should (a) NOT contain material that is false, intentionally misleading, or
>defamatory; contains material that is unlawful, including illegal hate
>speech or pornography; exploits or otherwise harms minors; or violates or
>advocates the violation of any law or regulation and (b) be in line with
>some generic principles of content that is welcome?
>I have not seen any other terms that consider these points.
More information about the legal-talk