[OSM-legal-talk] Editing Derived Database Extracts and ODbL

osm.oliver.kuehn at gmx.de osm.oliver.kuehn at gmx.de
Fri May 21 20:07:29 BST 2010


Hi,
> I don't think this distinction of >whether you can keep your database
>updated or not is anywhere in the >ODbL.  If it was the way you explain
>it, it would be really easy to make a >dataset containing all the
>useful data and not bound by the >limitations a Derived Work bears.
>You could even generate a new >Produced Work automatically every >time
>something changes in OpenStreetMap >and never have to release your
>additions.

The interesting point is that this behaviour exactly applies to a jpg-file that is derived from the database and which is doubtlessly classified as Produced Work: with every update of the osm-data you can create a new jpg-file and it always remains a Produced Work.

I see only two points that characterize the jpg-file as special: you cannot disasseble it and you cannot trace back to osm database elements automatically.

Regards,
Oliver




More information about the legal-talk mailing list