[OSM-legal-talk] Best license for future tiles?
Ed Avis
eda at waniasset.com
Thu Nov 18 18:50:47 GMT 2010
Anthony <osm at ...> writes:
>>Yes - it's quite separate - you do not receive any licence to the original
>>data but you do get a licence to all copyright interest in the small bit of
>>map you received
>
>As you have correctly pointed out with regard to the contributor
>terms, you aren't allowed to grant a license on someone else's
>copyright without permission.
Correct! So it matters whether the tiles are produced by OSMF itself
or by a third party.
>So a license from, say, MapQuest,
>granting you permission to use the tiles under CC-BY-SA, only covers
>MapQuest's copyright, which only extends to the material contributed
>by MapQuest, not to the preexisting material already in the work.
...in which case, surely, we have the situation that in general, CC-BY-SA
map tiles cannot be made from the OSM data, although OSMF itself has the
power to do so because of the special rights granted by the contributor terms.
>>since you have not even looked at the original data you cannot
>>be infringing copyright in that (similar to 'clean room' rules)
>
>Depends to what extent map data is copyrightable. If I write a score,
>and someone else records a piano rendition of the score, and a third
>person converts that recording back to a score, that score is still
>copyrighted by the original author.
Absolutely! I am not disputing that at all.
I am saying that if you write a score, and then *with your permission and
authorization* somebody distributes a recording of it under CC-BY or
other permissive licence, then a person receiving it can exercise the
rights granted by the licence to turn it back into the original score.
>In any case, clean room rules don't apply to database rights. So if
>you live in a jurisdiction with database rights, you can pretty much
>throw away that argument.
Yes, that is a separate argument.
--
Ed Avis <eda at waniasset.com>
More information about the legal-talk
mailing list