On 11/19/2010 11:22 AM, Ed Avis wrote: > Anthony<osm at ...> writes: > >> On the other hand, I'd say the tiles aren't *really* under CC-BY-SA, >> if the underlying data is subject to the ODbL. > > Right. (If your interpretation of the ODbL is correct - which others here > disagree with.) At length. ;-) - Rob.