[OSM-legal-talk] CT, section 3

Matthias Julius lists at julius-net.net
Fri Nov 26 12:56:44 GMT 2010


On Fri, 26 Nov 2010 13:14:39 +0100, "Olaf Schmidt-Wischhöfer"
<olaf at amen-online.de> wrote:
> Hi Mike,
> 
>> But I don't understand, If you are
>> going to change the CT that has been signed by all these people, don't
>> you have to ask them to sign the new version as well? or did they sign
>> the blank check already and have no say?
> 
> The License Working Group says that people who agreed to CT v.1.0 will
be 
> allowed to switch to the new CT rules, but they will be forced to do so.

Not exactly.  The LWG say that the new CT are a sub-set of CT 1.0.  There
is no need for people to explicitly agree to that, but they will be given
the opportunity anyway.

Matthias



More information about the legal-talk mailing list