[OSM-legal-talk] CT, section 3

[Richard Fairhurst]

Olaf Schmidt-Wischhöfer wrote:
> b) Many people contribute to OpenStreetMap and would prefer a Public 
> Domain license.
> [...]
> I do not know, however, whether people in group "b" are interested in a 
> compromise or whether a fork of OpenStreetMap is seen as inevitable 
> anyway.

Plenty of PD supporters _are_ interested in a compromise, _are_ actively
supporting ODbL, and have _no_ intention of actively campaigning to move OSM
towards a permissive licence. I'm one such.

cheers
Richard


-- 
View this message in context: http://gis.638310.n2.nabble.com/OSM-legal-talk-CT-section-3-tp5775564p5777224.html
Sent from the Legal Talk mailing list archive at Nabble.com.