[OSM-legal-talk] CT, section 3

[Mike Dupont]

On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 4:06 PM, Frederik Ramm <frederik at remote.org> wrote:

> Do you *really* think it is right to say: What's mine is mine, and if those
> 100 people in 10 years make any step that I don't like then I will withdraw
> my work from under them?

please stop at this point.

We are not talking about withdrawing anything here, some people have
decided to make an unpopular decision to change the license to
something incompatible here. No one is withdrawing anything.

If you have a license, then make it closed, dont leave any loopholes
or blank check rules in there that involve trusting some unknown set
of people that can change at any time. Make simple rules and I will be
happy.

The problem that I see is that you dont have the terms worked out and
you want us to agree that you will figure out the problem in the
future, because of some vague fears that someone might abuse the
current license.

Well let me tell you , I think you should work out your licenses, make
it really nice and tight and then present it for review, don't ask us
to sign away all future rights.

thanks,
mike