[OSM-legal-talk] CT, section 3

Anthony osm at inbox.org
Fri Nov 26 15:53:00 GMT 2010


On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 10:39 AM, Frederik Ramm <frederik at remote.org> wrote:
> How can we have the hubris to say "we know what's best
> for OSM in 10 years"?

Preserving the right to opt out of future changes doesn't say that.
On the contrary, it is an expression of uncertainty over the future.



More information about the legal-talk mailing list