[OSM-legal-talk] OS Opendata & the new license

[Richard Fairhurst]

TimSC wrote:
> It may be possible to argue that OSMF did try to engage the 
> community. Rather than me try to make the case, it's more 
> fun seeing what justifications people are trying to use on the 
> mailing list!

Seriously?

You actually see this as some sort of trolling contest, trying to get a rise
out of people because it's "more fun"?

I've been taking part in the debate because I'm keen to see that
OpenStreetMap has the best licence possible and the most high-quality
geodata under that licence. I realise Liz has already posted elsewhere that
she's aiming to be disruptive, but I hadn't realised that it was some form
of sub-4chan concerted trolling expedition.

Richard
-- 
View this message in context: http://gis.638310.n2.nabble.com/OSM-legal-talk-OS-Opendata-the-new-license-tp5538273p5591187.html
Sent from the Legal Talk mailing list archive at Nabble.com.