[OSM-legal-talk] OS Opendata & the new license

SteveC steve at asklater.com
Fri Oct 1 14:58:30 BST 2010


On Oct 1, 2010, at 6:43 AM, Richard Fairhurst wrote:
> TimSC wrote:
>> It may be possible to argue that OSMF did try to engage the 
>> community. Rather than me try to make the case, it's more 
>> fun seeing what justifications people are trying to use on the 
>> mailing list!
> 
> Seriously?
> 
> You actually see this as some sort of trolling contest, trying to get a rise
> out of people because it's "more fun"?
> 
> I've been taking part in the debate because I'm keen to see that
> OpenStreetMap has the best licence possible and the most high-quality
> geodata under that licence. I realise Liz has already posted elsewhere that
> she's aiming to be disruptive, but I hadn't realised that it was some form
> of sub-4chan concerted trolling expedition.

You must be new here...

Personally I think it's time to consider kickbanning the trolls with the fake names. Half of them got booted from wikipedia it seems, so I don't see why we have to put up with it.

Steve

stevecoast.com




More information about the legal-talk mailing list