[OSM-legal-talk] OS Opendata & the new license

[Dave F.]

  On 01/10/2010 23:53, Grant Slater wrote:
> On 1 October 2010 23:40, andrzej zaborowski<balrogg at gmail.com>  wrote:
>
>> The people who
>> drafted the CT are not very keen on discussing the CT here otherwise,
>> so this may be the only way to let them know and exercise some
>> democracy in the project.
>>
> I am not the most wordy person in the world.

I've never expected an LWG member to be verbose.

As I said in my OP:

"As I'm a simple lad, can I ask any replies to be a clear, concise & 
factual as possible please."

All I've ever wanted was categorical, non caveat answers. After all this 
time that the LWG has been discussing this subject, I'm still unable to 
receive an objective answer. I find that disappointing.

> Some just seem to enjoy arguing, draining goodwill and have stated
> they are here to be "politely" disruptive.

The vast majority just want the truth. When are we going to get it?


regards
Dave F.