[OSM-legal-talk] Legal or not? user srpskicrv and source = TOPO 25 VGI BEOGRAD

[John Smith]

On 3 October 2010 01:48, Frederik Ramm <frederik at remote.org> wrote:
> Right... and OSM needs to be usable in India too, so it must show Kashmir as
> belonging to India as it would otherwise be illegal. And of course OSM must
> be usable in Pakistan so it must show Kashmir as disputed territory
> otherwise it would be illegal. And in China of course, we must only include
> mapping that as been supervised by local goverments and done by mappers who
> are approved by central government. And as for N Korea, we should probably
> delete that altogether.

None of those examples applies since it was a question about copyright
ownership.