[OSM-legal-talk] OS Opendata & the new license

[Rob Myers]

On 10/02/2010 12:18 AM, Dave F. wrote:
>
> Broadcasting the fact you think a contributor, who disagrees with you,
> should be banned purely because they have a nickname is:
>
> petty/puerile/childish/insecure/inept/pompous/arrogant

That is not the argument.

The argument is that various people on this list are *using* anonymity 
as cover for arguing in bad faith in order to be disruptive.

Anonymity isn't a problem. Anonymous trolling is.

> I can't make an informed decision about which way I should go until I
> have concrete evidence about what will happen with the data, in all it's
> forms, that I have added.

Data that you are unable or unwilling to relicence will be removed.

OSM has ongoing contact with the OS and hopefully a solution can be 
found to traced data inclusion.

If you agree to the CTs at this point, the worst thing that will happen 
is that your data cannot be used by OSM.

- Rob.