[OSM-legal-talk] Checking if I understand correctly...

[Jukka Rahkonen]

Ed Avis <eda at ...> writes:

> What I meant to say was: under these contributor terms, OSM is not compatible
> with itself!  Although the OSM project licenses its data under CC-BY-SA
> or under ODbL, it would not accept such licences from others.
> 
> Whether this really matters, or is just an obscure point of principle, is open
> to debate.  But it's certainly the case.

It is hard to believe that we want to build such a system but if that is 
the case then it will matter once someone takes some OSM data and lets own 
users to do updates and inserts. Isn't for example OpenAddresses such a 
project?