[OSM-legal-talk] legal FAQ license
Frederik Ramm
frederik at remote.org
Thu Oct 14 07:42:03 BST 2010
Hi,
Richard Weait wrote:
> Is there some OSM contribution or edit that is so mechanical and/or so
> insignificant that it need never be considered for copyright or
> database right?
Any edit made by a robot - e.g. one that fixes spelling mistakes -
certainly qualifies for "never be considered for copyright" because
copyright needs humans to do something; I'm not sure about database
right though.
Bye
Frederik
More information about the legal-talk
mailing list